Specificity of serum prostate-specific antigen determination in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial
Open Access
- 9 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 96 (1), 56-60
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603522
Abstract
Specificity constitutes a component of validity for a screening test. The number of false-positive (FP) results has been regarded as one of major shortcomings in prostate cancer screening. We estimated the specificity of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determination in prostate cancer screening using data from a randomised, controlled screening trial conducted in Finland with 32 000 men in the screening arm. We calculated the specificity as the proportion of men with negative findings (screen negatives, SN) relative to those with negative and FP results (SN/(SN+FP)). A SN finding was defined as either PSA ⩽ 4 ng ml−1 or PSA 3.0–3.9 ng ml−1 combined with a negative ancillary test (digital rectal examination, DRE or free/total, F/T PSA ratio). False positives were those with positive screening test followed by a negative diagnostic examination. Of the 30 194 eligible men, 20 794 (69%) attended the first screening round and 1968 (9.5%) had a screen-positive finding. A total of 508 prostate cancers were detected at screening (2.4%). Hence, the number of SN findings was 18 825 and the number of FP results 1358. Specificity was estimated as 0.933 (18 825 out of 20 183) with 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.929–0.936. Specificity decreased with age. Digital rectal examination as ancillary examination had similar or higher specificity than F/T PSA. In the second screening round, specificity was slightly lower (0.912, 95% CI 0.908–0.916). The specificity of PSA screening in the Finnish screening trial is acceptable. Further improvement in specificity could, however, improve acceptability of screening and decrease screening costs.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening for Breast CancerJAMA, 2005
- Prevalence of Prostate Cancer among Men with a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level ≤4.0 ng per MilliliterNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Effect of Verification Bias on Screening for Prostate Cancer by Measurement of Prostate-Specific AntigenNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Large‐scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: Program performances in the European randomized screening for prostate cancer trial and the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovary cancer trialInternational Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Evaluation of the Digital Rectal Examination as a Screening Test for Prostate CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1998
- A Comparison of Fecal Occult-Blood Tests for Colorectal-Cancer ScreeningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Data Quality and Quality Control of a Population-Based Cancer Registry: Experience in FinlandActa Oncologica, 1994
- Prostate antigen: A new potential marker for prostatic cancerThe Prostate, 1981
- A New Design for Randomized Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Latent carcinoma of prostate at autopsy in seven areas. Collaborative study organized by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyons, FranceInternational Journal of Cancer, 1977