But Do They Care About Fairness? The Dynamics of Preferential Treatment and Minority Interest
- 1 September 1987
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Basic and Applied Social Psychology
- Vol. 8 (3), 177-191
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0803_1
Abstract
Why is it that increasing the number of women in an occupation through equal opportunity mechanisms causes potential beneficiaries of affirmative action to become less interested in the occupation? To account for that finding, it was hypothesized that not only the outcome of a selection process but the perceived fairness of the selection procedure affects the inferences beneficiaries make about an organization. Inferences of dispositions toward fairness in particular were expected to have a major influence on attraction to an organization. In response to a description of a situation in which they benefited from affirmative action selection, and in which selectee qualifications, the organization's history of discrimination, and the type of affirmative action procedure were manipulated, participants made inferences about an organization. The manipulations of qualifications and affirmative action procedure influenced perceived fairness of the procedure, dispositional inferences, and attraction to the organization. Moreover, dispositional inferences influenced attraction to the organization most. These findings underscore the need to study outcome-based and procedure-based social inferences for theoretical and practical concerns. These results also indicate that organizations should evaluate carefully the (actual and perceived) procedural aspects of their affirmative action policy.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Organizational symbols: A study of their meanings and influences on perceived psychological climateOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986
- Selection procedure and responses to affirmative action: The case of favorable treatment.Law and Human Behavior, 1985
- Affirmative action, negative reaction? Some moderating conditionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984
- The Situational Origins of Human TendenciesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1983
- Procedural Justice, Participation, and the Fair Process Effect in Groups and OrganizationsPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- Social Change and the Contexts of Justice MotivationPublished by Springer Nature ,1981
- Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interest.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Effects of "voice" and peer opinions on responses to inequity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- High school students' occupational interest as a function of projected sex ratios in male-dominated occupations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- A Theory of ProcedureCalifornia Law Review, 1978