Trends from the United States with end of life decisions in the intensive care unit
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Springer Nature in Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 19 (6), 316-322
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01694704
Abstract
To describe the changes that have occurred in the United States since medicine has moved away from a paternalistic model to one that promotes patient autonomy and self-determination. To discuss the implications for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the increasing use of when not to perform CPR and other life-sustaining therapies. To describe the various interpretations of the ritual term Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) and to introduce the concept of futility in the context of non-beneficial over-treatment and discriminatory under-treatment.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Imposed work of breathing and methods of triggering a demand-flow, continuous positive airway pressure systemCritical Care Medicine, 1993
- Advance Directives for Medical Care — A Case for Greater UseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- A Prospective Study of Advance Directives for Life-Sustaining CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Withholding and Withdrawal of Life Support from the Critically IllNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Ethics and Communication in Do-Not-Resuscitate OrdersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Initiating and Withdrawing Life SupportNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Randomized Clinical Study of Thiopental Loading in Comatose Survivors of Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- The Physician's Responsibility toward Hopelessly Ill PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Survival after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- “Code” or “No Code”: A Nonlegal OpinionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979