Mate choice for offspring performance: major benefits or minor costs?
- 7 December 1998
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 265 (1412), 2297-2301
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0574
Abstract
There is considerable disagreement over whether or not gaining viability benefits to offspring could be substantial enough to overcome the costs of female choosiness. A recent review suggested that the ‘lek paradox’ might be resolved by large indirect benefits as indicated by highly heritable ornamental traits. We selected males of a wolf spider Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata in relation to their sexual signalling rate (audible drumming). The estimated correlated response in offspring viability was rather small (0.12 s.d.). However, it may be large enough if the costs of being choosy are small. In fact, females mate with better–than–average males just by responding passively to a random drumming signal, and the active choice by females seemed to increase this benefit only slightly. In many mating systems, females obtain better–than–average males as a consequence of intense male–male competition or because of the extraordinary variance in male signalling. The costs of any additional choice may be so minor that female choice for honestly signalling males may evolve even with minute benefits in offspring viability. This may be the general solution to the lek paradox, as most studies report no apparent fitness benefits. Publication bias favouring statistically significant results may have led to an overemphasis on the few studies with large effects.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Natural selection bias?Nature, 1997
- The "File Drawer Problem" of Non-Significant Results: Does It Apply to Biological Research?Oikos, 1996
- Viability costs of condition-dependent sexual male display in a drumming wolf spiderProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1996
- What is ‘the paradox of the lek’?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1996
- Offspring quality and female choice in the guppy,Poecilia reticulataAnimal Behaviour, 1995
- Intersexual Selection and Reproductive Success in the Pheasant Phasianus colchicusThe American Naturalist, 1994
- Costs and Benefits of Female Mate Choice: Is There a Lek Paradox?The American Naturalist, 1990
- Lifetime Reproductive Success and Heritability: Empirical Support for Fisher's Fundamental TheoremThe American Naturalist, 1986
- Paternal Effects on Juvenile Growth in Scaphiopus multiplicatus (The New Mexico Spadefoot Toad)The American Naturalist, 1986
- Genetic Consequences of Mate Choice: A Quantitative Genetic Method for Testing Sexual Selection TheoryScience, 1985