A preventive intervention program for the newly separated: Final evaluations.
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
- Vol. 55 (1), 9-26
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1985.tb03418.x
Abstract
Results of 30-month and four-year follow-ups of a six-month preventive program for people recently separated were even more favorable than the positive follow-ups at six and 18 months. At 30 months, intervention group members scored significantly higher than control group members on dependent measures of adjustment, had significantly fewer separation-related problems, and reported significantly greater separation-related benefits. At four years, intervention group members continued to report significantly more satisfactory levels of adjustment and life quality, although the differences were not as great. Benefits did not all appear at the same time, or equally in men and women, and some benefits did not appear until well after the program ended. Data on marital status transitions during the four-year follow-up period are analyzed, and suggestions are offered for further enhancing program effectiveness.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH26373)
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A preventive program for the newly separated: Initial evaluationAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 1982
- Divorce ResearchJournal of Divorce, 1981
- Adjustment to Separation Among Former CohabitersJournal of Divorce, 1981
- Sex Differences in Adjustment during the Process of Marital SeparationJournal of Marriage and Family, 1981
- The predicament of the newly separatedCommunity Mental Health Journal, 1981
- Marital disruption as a stressor: A review and analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- Social Indicators of Well-BeingPublished by Springer Nature ,1976
- The significance of life events as etiologic factors in the diseases of childrenJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 1972
- The social readjustment rating scaleJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 1967