Alignment talk in the job interview
- 1 September 1981
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Applied Communication Research
- Vol. 9 (2), 85-103
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00909888109360293
Abstract
The research reported here describes aligning talk in simulated employment interviews. Alignment talk is used metacommunicatively by speakers to bracket, transform, or qualify other talk, hence it assumes great importance in how communicators define and evaluate situations. Four features of alignment talk appear both in the scholarly literature and in the speech of interview participants in our data: accounts, meta‐talk, formulations, and qualifiers. Each of these features are described in the present report, and their uses in job interviews are explored. It is concluded that these devices serve to accentuate role differences between interviewer and applicant, and to enforce rather stringent norms of how one talks in the job interview. Implications for interviewing practice are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE TAKEN-FOR-GRANTEDHuman Communication Research, 1981
- Remediation and legislation in everyday talk: How communicators achieve consensusQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1980
- RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF VERBAL, ARTICULATIVE, AND NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION TO EMPLOYMENT DECISIONS IN THE JOB INTERVIEW SETTINGPersonnel Psychology, 1979
- Employment Interview Literature: A Perspective for the CounselorVocational Guidance Quarterly, 1977
- Influence of nonverbal communication and rater proximity on impressions and decisions in simulated employment interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- A Contingency Theory of SocializationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1976
- DisclaimersAmerican Sociological Review, 1975
- Realistic expectations as an aid in reducing voluntary resignations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974
- Behavior Modification and Training the Disadvantaged Job IntervieweeVocational Guidance Quarterly, 1973
- Situated Actions and Vocabularies of MotiveAmerican Sociological Review, 1940