Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife management
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Biological Reviews
- Vol. 80 (3), 387-401
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793105006718
Abstract
Mammalian carnivore populations are often intensively managed, either because the carnivore in question is endangered, or because it is viewed as a pest and is subjected to control measures, or both. Most management programmes treat carnivore species in isolation. However, there is a large and emerging body of evidence to demonstrate that populations of different carnivores interact with each other in a variety of complex ways. Thus, the removal or introduction of predators to or from a system can often affect other species in ways that are difficult to predict. Wildlife managers must consider such interactions when planning predator control programmes. Integrated predator control will require a greater understanding of the complex relationships between species. In many parts of the world, sympatric species of carnivores have coexisted over an evolutionary time scale so that niche differentiation has occurred, and competition is difficult to observe. Australia has experienced numerous introductions during the past 200 years, including those of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and the feral cat (Felis catus). These species now exist in sympatry with native mammalian predators, providing ecologists with the opportunity to study their interactions without the confounding effects of coevolution. Despite an increasing body of observational evidence for complex interactions among native and introduced predators in Australia, few studies have attempted to clarify these relationships experimentally, and the interactions remain largely unacknowledged. A greater understanding of these interactions would provide ecologists and wildlife managers world‐wide with the ability to construct robust predictive models of carnivore communities, and to identify their broader effects on ecosystem functioning. We suggest that future research should focus on controlled and replicated predator removal or addition experiments. The dingo (Canis lupus dingo), as a likely keystone species, should be a particular focus of attention.Keywords
This publication has 106 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do wild dogs exclude foxes? Evidence for competition from dietary and spatial overlapsAustral Ecology, 2005
- Four Factors Modifying the Effect of Competition on Carnivore Population Dynamics as Illustrated by African Wild DogsConservation Biology, 2001
- Two ecological universes separated by the Dingo Barrier Fence in semi-arid Australia: interactions between landscapes, herbivory and carnivory, with and without dingoesThe Rangeland Journal, 2001
- Competition and intraguild predation among three sympatric carnivoresOecologia, 2000
- Monitoring coyote population changes with a passive activity indexWildlife Research, 2000
- Feeding ecology and population dynamics of the feral cat (Felis catus) in relation to the availability of prey in central-eastern New South WalesWildlife Research, 1999
- Secondary poisoning of stoats (Mustela erminea), feral ferrets (Mustela furo),and feral house cats (Felis catus) by the anticoagulant poison, brodifacoumNew Zealand Journal of Zoology, 1996
- Herpestes auropunctatusMammalian Species, 1989
- Similarities and contrasts in the diets of foxes, Vulpes vulpes, and cats, Felis catus, relative to fluctuating prey populations and droughtWildlife Research, 1988
- Predation, Competition, and Prey Communities: A Review of Field ExperimentsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1985