The Greatest Game no more - Redundant Dockers and the Demise of `Dock Work'
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Work, Employment & Society
- Vol. 8 (4), 487-506
- https://doi.org/10.1177/095001709484001
Abstract
Prior to the abolition of the National Dock Labour Scheme (NDLS) in July 1989, registered dock workers had good jobs. This was the result, first and foremost, of militant solidarity on the part of dock workers and, of course, the NDLS, which was itself a principal outcome of organised struggle. Deregulation post-1989 has transformed `dock work' to such an extent that the industry no longer offers the kind of extrinsic or intrinsic rewards enjoyed by dockers in the past; but the restructuring of the industry was only made possible by the mass redundancy of ex-registered dockers, in particular trade union activists. It was redundancy, in conjunction with the abolition of the NDLS, that led to the demise of what was once the `greatest game in the world'.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Co-operation or Control? Capital Restructuring and Labour Relations on the DocksBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1993
- The British port transport industry Part 1. Operational structure, investment and competitionMaritime Policy & Management, 1993
- The British port transport industry part 2. Employment, working practices and productivityMaritime Policy & Management, 1993
- Dock Strikes and the Demise of the Dockers' ‘Occupational Culture’Sociological Review, 1992
- Labour Market Deregulation and Economic Performance: The Case of Britain's DocksWork, Employment & Society, 1991
- Leaner and possibly fitter: the management of redundancy in BritainIndustrial Relations Journal, 1988
- Redundancy, Labour Markets and Informal RelationsSociological Review, 1985
- SIZE OF WORKFORCE, MORALE AND ABSENTEEISM: A RE‐EXAMINATIONBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1982
- Approaches to the study of redundancyIndustrial Relations Journal, 1977
- AFTER THE ‘SHAKE-OUT’Oxford Economic Papers, 1972