A Mixed Model for Two‐State Markov Processes Under Panel Observation
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Biometrics
- Vol. 55 (3), 915-920
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00915.x
Abstract
Summary. Many chronic medical conditions can be meaningfully characterized in terms of a two‐state stochastic process. Here we consider the problem in which subjects make transitions among two such states in continuous time but are only observed at discrete, irregularly spaced time points that are possibly unique to each subject. Data arising from such an observation scheme are called panel data, and methods for related analyses are typically based on Markov assumptions. The purpose of this article is to present a conditionally Markov model that accommodates subject‐to‐subject variation in the model parameters by the introduction of random effects. We focus on a particular random effects formulation that generates a closed‐form expression for the marginal likelihood. The methodology is illustrated by application to a data set from a parasitic field infection survey.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Two-state mixed renewal processes for chronic diseaseStatistics in Medicine, 1999
- USE OF A STOCHASTIC MODEL FOR REPEATED BINARY ASSESSMENTStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- A Model for Binary Time Series Data with Serial Odds Ratio PatternsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1995
- Markov modelsStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Review papers : Statistical models for estimating prevalence and incidence of parasitic diseasesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1993
- Three-Year Outcomes for Maintenance Therapies in Recurrent DepressionArchives of General Psychiatry, 1990
- Estimation of parasitic infection dynamics when detectability is imperfectStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- A Random Effects Model for Binary DataPublished by JSTOR ,1990
- Modelling the liver function data in diabetesStatistics in Medicine, 1988
- The Analysis of Panel Data under a Markov AssumptionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1985