Validation of a Nomogram for Prediction of Side Specific Extracapsular Extension at Radical Prostatectomy
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 175 (3), 939-944
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)00342-3
Abstract
We have previously have reported a tree structured regression model for predicting SS-ECE. Others recently reported a logistic regression based SS-ECE nomogram. We developed a nomogram and compared the performance and discriminant properties of the tree regression and the nomogram in a contemporary cohort of European patients treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy. The cohort consisted of 1,118 patients with pretreatment prostate specific antigen 0.1 to 73.2 ng/ml (median 6.6). Each of the 2,236 prostate lobes was considered separately. Clinical stage, pretreatment PSA, biopsy Gleason sum, percent positive cores and percent cancer in the biopsy specimen were used as predictors in a logistic regression model predicting SS-ECE. Regression coefficients were then used to generate an SS-ECE nomogram. Performance characteristics and discriminant properties of the previously published tree regression were also tested in the same cohort. For internal validation and to decrease overfit bias 200 bootstrap re-samples were applied to accuracy estimates for each method. ECE was present in 303 of 1,118 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens (27%) and in 385 lobes (17%). In logistic regression models all variables were statistically significant multivariate predictors of SS-ECE except the percent of positive biopsy cores (p = 0.7). Bootstrap corrected predictive accuracy of the SS-ECE nomogram was 0.840 vs 0.700 for the tree regression model. Logistic regression based nomogram predictions of SS-ECE are highly accurate and represent a valuable aid for assessing the risk of ECE prior to surgery.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Accuracy Between the Partin Tables Of 1997 and 2001 to Predict Final Pathological Stage in Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2004
- Quantitative biopsy pathology for the prediction of pathologically organ‐confined prostate carcinomaCancer, 2003
- Nomograms as predictive modelsSeminars in Urologic Oncology, 2002
- How Well Does The Partin Nomogram Predict Pathological Stage After Radical Prostatectomy In A Community Based Population? Results Of The Cancer Of The Prostate Strategic Urological Research EndeavorJournal of Urology, 2002
- Prediction of prostate carcinoma stage by quantitative biopsy pathologyCancer, 2001
- Observations on pathology trends in 62,537 prostate biopsies obtained from urology private practices in the United StatesUrology, 1998
- Update on the Appropriate Staging Evaluation for Newly Diagnosed Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1997
- Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional updatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- An Algorithm for Predicting Nonorgan Confined Prostate Cancer Using the Results Obtained from Sextant Core Biopsies with Prostate Specific Antigen LevelJournal of Urology, 1996
- Frequency and Location of Extracapsular Extensionand Positive Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensJournal of Urology, 1992