Ghost Marketing: Pharmaceutical Companies and Ghostwritten Journal Articles
Top Cited Papers
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
- Vol. 50 (1), 18-31
- https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2007.0009
Abstract
The use of ghostwriters by industry is subject to increasing public attention and scrutiny. This article addresses the practice and ethics of scientific ghostwriting. We focus on the type of ghostwriting that involves a pharmaceutical company hiring a medical education and communications company to write a paper favorable of their product, who then hires a well-known academic to publish it under his or her name without disclosing the paper's true origins. We argue that this practice is harmful both to the public and to the institutions of science and that it is not justified by an analogy to accepted scientific authorship practices. Finally, we consider ways to discourage the practice.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scientists behaving badlyNature, 2005
- The corporate coauthorJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2005
- Medical Journals Are an Extension of the Marketing Arm of Pharmaceutical CompaniesPLoS Medicine, 2005
- Pharma Goes to the Laundry: Public Relations and the Business of Medical EducationThe Hastings Center Report, 2004
- Interface between authorship, industry and science in the domain of therapeuticsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2003
- Evidence b(i)ased medicine--selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applicationsBMJ, 2003
- Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic reviewBMJ, 2003
- Haunted papersThe Lancet, 2002
- Separating Continuing Medical Education From Pharmaceutical MarketingJAMA, 2001
- Buying EditorialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994