Implementing practice guidelines for diabetes care using problem-based learning. A prospective controlled trial using firm systems.
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 22 (10), 1672-1678
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.10.1672
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A controlled trial with 15-month follow-up was conducted in two outpatient clinics to study the effects of using the problem-based learning technique to implement a diabetes clinical practice guideline. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 144 patients with type 2 diabetes aged 25-65 years in two internal medicine outpatient clinics were enrolled in the study. African-Americans and Hispanics made up > 75% of the patients. Doctors and staff in one of the clinics were trained in the use of a clinical practice guideline based on Staged Diabetes Management. A problem-based learning educational program was instituted to reach consensus on a stepped intensification scheme for glycemic control and to determine the standards of care used in the clinic. HbA1c was obtained at baseline and at 9 and 15 months after enrollment. RESULTS: At 9 months, there was a mean -0.90% within-subject change in HbA1c in the intervention group, with no significant changes in the control group. The 15-month mean within-subject change in HbA1c of -0.62% in the intervention group was also significant. Among intervention patients, those with the poorest glycemic control at baseline realized the greatest benefit in improvement of HbA1c. The intervention group also exhibited significant changes in physician adherence with American Diabetes Association standards of care. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice guidelines are an effective way of improving the processes and outcomes of care for patients with diabetes. Problem-based learning is a useful strategy to gain physician support for clinical practice guidelines. More intensive interventions are needed to maintain treatment gains.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- Standards of Medical Care for Patients With Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 1998
- Glycemic Control and the Risk for Coronary Heart Disease in Patients with Non-Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus: The Finnish StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- Relation of Glycemic Control to Diabetic Microvascular Complications in Diabetes MellitusAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- Clinical Management of the NIDDM Patient: Impact of the American Diabetes Association Practice Guidelines, 1985–1993Diabetes Care, 1995
- Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year studyDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 1995
- Measuring and Improving Physician Compliance with Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Controlled Interventional TrialAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Health care expenditures for people with diabetes mellitus, 1992.Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1994
- The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Testing for Blood Glucose by Office-Based Physicians in the U.S.Diabetes Care, 1990