Antibiotic Trials in Intra-abdominal Infections
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 200 (1), 29-39
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198407000-00005
Abstract
Published trials of antibiotic therapy for intraabdominal infection were reviewed to determine factors in study design that might impair identification of clinically important differences between regimens. Sixteen articles were identified that provided sufficient numbers of cases and data for analysis. Eight were prospective comparative trials, the remainder single-armed studies. The mortality rate was 3.5%; the overall success rate was 84% for aminoglycoside plus clindamycin (range 52-96%), 89% (range 83-93%) for aminoglycoside plus metronidazole and 93% (range 61-95%) for cephalosporin-based regimens. Several defects in study design were identified. Exclusionary criteria employed generally prevented enrollment of seriously ill patients or infections associated with high failure rates: patients were excluded if even mild renal impairment was present or if antibiotic therapy had been recently administered, thereby excluding patients with postoperative or recurrent infections. Several studies allowed entry of contaminated but not infected patients. Criteria used for reporting infectious diagnosis, premorbid health status, severity of infection and outcome were nonuniform; few studies provided such information. Despite the small number of treatment failures, data reported did not allow determination of the basis for failure. For example, only 4 studies provided information on the operations performed upon treatment failures. Whether treatment failures were due to inadequate antibiotic therapy could therefore not be determined. Enrollment of a variety of low mortality infections precluded demonstration of any differences in regimens. Use of stratified randomization, stratifying for site of infection and severity of infection, and inclusion of greater numbers of patients would increase the likelihood of identifying differences between regimens. Such study design would likely require a multicenter trial to enroll sufficient numbers of cases for statistical analysis.This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Severity of illness and the relationship between intensive care and survival.American Journal of Public Health, 1982
- Critical Importance of Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Intra-abdominal InfectionArchives of Surgery, 1982
- -Lactamases and their clinical significanceJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1982
- Cost comparison of two Antimicrobial regimens for treating mixed aerobic-anaerobic infectionsAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 1981
- APACHE—acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification systemCritical Care Medicine, 1981
- Moxalactam therapy for a wide spectrum of bacterial infections in adultsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1981
- Clinical comparison of cefotaxime versus the combination of gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of peritonitis and similar polymicrobial soft-tissue surgical sepsis.1981
- A multicentre comparison of clindamycin and metronidazole in the treatment of anaerobic infections.1981
- High-dose tobramycin combined with clindamycin or lincomycin in the treatment of septic peritonitis and intraabdominal sepsis.1981
- Comparative clinical trials in treatment of intra-abdominal sepsisJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1981