The Spread of Obesity in a Social Network
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 357 (18), 1866-1868
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc072478
Abstract
In the report on the spread of obesity in a social network, by Christakis and Fowler, and the accompanying editorial by Barabási (July 26 issue),1,2 variables of social and economic status (SES) are not mentioned. Social networks conceal a high degree of social homogeneity — that is, people are more likely to network with people at similar income and educational levels — and we suspect that they may operate differently in different contexts. For example, the way a social network affects the incidence of obesity in a community where most people have a low educational level and cannot afford a healthy diet is likely to differ from the way it affects an affluent and well-informed community. In 2000, obesity in the United States was reported to be highest among black women and people who had not completed high school,3 and among black women, a low socioeconomic position predicts an early onset of obesity.4 SES variables should be included in any interpretive model, and public health policies for the prevention of obesity should take into account the SES characteristics of the communities they are supposed to benefit.5Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 YearsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Network Medicine — From Obesity to the “Diseasome”New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- SOCIAL DYNAMICS OF OBESITYEconomic Inquiry, 2007
- Lifecourse Socioeconomic Position and Weight Change among Blacks: The Pitt County StudyObesity, 2007
- Social networks and collateral health effectsBMJ, 2004
- Self-perception of weight appropriateness in the United StatesAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2003
- Trends and Correlates of Class 3 Obesity in the United States From 1990 Through 2000JAMA, 2002
- Is more always better?: A survey on positional concernsJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1998
- On Randomized Controlled Trials and Lifestyle InterventionsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1989
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974