Efficacy of etanercept for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis according to the onset type
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 3 April 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 48 (4), 1093-1101
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10885
Abstract
Objective To assess the efficacy of etanercept in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and to assess the tolerance of these patients to etanercept. Methods All JIA patients with active chronic polyarthritis, who were first treated with etanercept between November 1999 and June 2001 in 18 French centers because of poor response or intolerance to methotrexate, were included in this open‐label, prospective, multicenter study. A standardized questionnaire was sent to the treating physicians. We assessed the validated international core‐set score for JIA activity every 3 months and performed an intent‐to‐treat analysis. We also compared the risk of treatment failure in patients defined as having systemic‐onset, oligoarticular‐onset, or polyarticular‐onset JIA. Results Sixty‐one patients were enrolled and were followed up for a median of 13 months. Treatment had to be stopped in 1 patient who became pregnant and in 12 patients due to severe side effects, including neurologic or psychiatric disorders, retrobulbar optic neuropathy, major weight gain, severe infection, cutaneous vasculitis with systemic symptoms, hemorrhagic diarrhea, uveitis flare, and pancytopenia. All of these side effects disappeared after discontinuation of etanercept. Crohn's disease was subsequently diagnosed in 1 child. Scores improved by ≥30% in 73% of patients after 3 months, but this proportion decreased to 39% after 12 months. The response rate was significantly lower in patients with systemic‐onset JIA than in those with oligoarticular‐ or polyarticular‐onset JIA. Conclusion Treatment of JIA with etanercept may be associated with a wide spectrum of severe side effects. Although most patients initially respond to etanercept, this initial response is not always followed by sustained improvement over longer periods of time. In addition, the higher rate of treatment failure in the group with systemic‐onset JIA indicates that these patients in particular may require alternative treatments.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Etanercept versus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: Two‐year radiographic and clinical outcomesArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- Etanercept in the treatment of adult patients with Still's diseaseArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- Development of rheumatoid nodules during anti–tumor necrosis factor α therapy with etanerceptArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- Etanercept‐induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosusRheumatology, 2001
- A combination of etanercept and methotrexate for the treatment of refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot studyAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2001
- Infliximab and Methotrexate in the Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- A Comparison of Etanercept and Methotrexate in Patients with Early Rheumatoid ArthritisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- A Trial of Etanercept, a Recombinant Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor:Fc Fusion Protein, in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving MethotrexateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Preliminary definition of improvement in juvenile arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1997
- Factors associated with response to methotrexate in systemic‐onset juvenile chronic arthritisActa Paediatrica, 1994