The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks
- 15 February 2008
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 61 (6), 537-545
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.011
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratiosStatistics in Medicine, 2006
- Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo studyStatistics in Medicine, 2006
- A comparison of propensity score methods: a case‐study estimating the effectiveness of post‐AMI statin useStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: a systematic reviewJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical dataStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research: a systematic literature reviewPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2004
- INTERPRETATION AND CHOICE OF EFFECT MEASURES IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSES1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariatesBiometrika, 1984
- Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity ScoreJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983