Where is the Schema? Critiques

Abstract

This symposium features three critiques of the argument about schema theory proffered by Kuklinski, Luskin, and Bolland. First, Milton Lodge and Kathleen M. McGraw, of the State University of New York at Stony Brook, respond from the perspective of cognitive psychology. Then Pamela J. Conover, of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Stanley Felman (also of Stony Brook) consider schema conceptualization mainly in terms of problems of measurement. Finally, Arthur H. Miller, of the University of Iowa, offers an information-processing approach to political schemas.