Improving Evoked Response Audiometry With Special Reference To The Use Of Machine Scoring
- 1 January 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Audiology
- Vol. 13 (1), 33-65
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00206097409089335
Abstract
The use of visual scoring of evoked response (ER) records to detect auditory threshold is reviewed, and it is concluded that current ER audiometry is not a reliable clinical tool because of substantial error compounded by subjectivity of score. The mathematics underlying ER detection is reviewed. The critical part played by the signal-to-noise ratio (f) and techniques for enhancing f are discussed. The accepted techniques of averaging, segregation by EEG classification before averaging, and filtering are considered, along with two newly proposed techiques, fast periodic stimulation and correction of records by predictors averaging. These hold promise of enhancing the effective f by a factor of about 3 and reducing the lenght of test runs by an order of magnitude. Self-normalization is introduced in order to define scores which are sensitive primarily to f rather than to these scores is relatively invariant from subject to subject since it depends on f alone. This simplifies normative studies, particularly for the no-ER condition for which f = 0, since estimates of type-II error, false positives, are independent of the subject. Five machine scores are defined: (1) normalized peak-to-trough amplitudes; (2) Normalized rectified mean amplitudes; (3) the ratio of power of the ER to that of the background EEG; (4) the correlation coefficients between subsets in the same run; and (5) a combined measure based on (3) and (4). The sensitivity of each of these measures and their dependence on f are considered. From the explorations thus far, it is concluded that machine scoring techiques are available which are at least as sensitive and reliable as visual scoring and which can be implemented by relatively simple, inexpensive special purpose computers. Furthermore, since machine scoring lends itself to a superior test strategy, it is concluded that machine scoring can greatly increase the sensitivity and reliability of ER audiometry. These conclusions apply without taking into account the vast improvements possible if the newly proposed techniques (fast periodic stimulation and correction by prediction) for enhancing f should prove successful.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adult Auditory Evoked Vertex Potentials In SleepInternational Journal of Audiology, 1973
- Auditory Evoked Response (AER) Consistency of Detection in Young Sleeping ChildrenJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1971
- Eeg Audiometry in Children Under Three Years of AgeActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1971
- A Comparison of Evoked Response and Subjective Auditory ThresholdsInternational Audiology, 1969
- Relations of the Human Vertex Potential to Acoustic Input: Loudness and MaskingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1968
- Early Components of Averaged Evoked Responses to Rapidly Repeated Auditory StimuliJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1967
- Further Validation of Evoked Response Audiometry (ERA)Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1967
- Auditory‐evoked responses in normal, brain‐damaged, and deaf infantsNeurology, 1967
- Averaged Evoked Responses for Measuring Auditory Sensitivity in ChildrenJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1966
- The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: Recovery processElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1966