Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 10 February 2012
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 1 (1), 10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-10
Abstract
Rapid reviews have emerged as a streamlined approach to synthesizing evidence - typically for informing emergent decisions faced by decision makers in health care settings. Although there is growing use of rapid review 'methods', and proliferation of rapid review products, there is a dearth of published literature on rapid review methodology. This paper outlines our experience with rapidly producing, publishing and disseminating evidence summaries in the context of our Knowledge to Action (KTA) research program.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Searches for evidence mapping: effective, shorter, cheaperJournal of the Medical Library Association, 2011
- Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviewsImplementation Science, 2010
- Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogues for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-analyses of Clinical Outcomes.2010
- NICE lifts cost limit on drugs to improve access to end of life treatmentsBMJ, 2009
- RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?Anz Journal of Surgery, 2008
- Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic ReviewsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2008
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic ReviewsPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2007
- Method guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group systematic reviews.2006
- Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006