Learning to lose in the mathematics classroom: a critique of traditional schooling practices in the UK
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
- Vol. 9 (1), 17-33
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839960090103
Abstract
“Back‐to‐basics” policies fit easily within many mathematics classrooms. Features such as order, control, rule following, uniformity, and conformity are relatively commonplace and are now more generally in demand with the current political backlash against progressive forms of schooling. This paper examines some of the influences of these traditional features of classrooms through a case study of one mathematics department in the United Kingdom. Interviews with students, lesson observations, results of questionnaires, and other case study data are analysed to show the ways in which traditional forms of learning can inhibit understanding, reify the divide between school and the “real world,” and suppress the transfer of knowledge. The findings suggest that two key elements of British Conservative education policy the commitment to traditional forms of schooling and the drive to produce school leavers capable of adapting to the demands of the 21st century — are fundamentally in conflict.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Guide to Classroom ObservationPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- Seeing the point of mathematics†International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1992
- Explorations of Students' Mathematical Beliefs and BehaviorJournal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1989
- Cognition in PracticePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1988
- Three DimensionsPublished by Springer Nature ,1987
- Academic WorkReview of Educational Research, 1983
- Schooling the Smash Street KidsPublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,1979
- An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978