Criterion for Comparing Analyzers
- 1 April 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AIP Publishing in Review of Scientific Instruments
- Vol. 41 (4), 561-564
- https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1684578
Abstract
In view of the recent development of several new electrostatic analyzers, the need arises for a criterion for comparing their figures of merit. A criterion usually used in β spectrometry is proposed and is shown to be preferable to another criterion proposed recently.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the Spherical Deflector and the Cylindrical Mirror AnalyzersReview of Scientific Instruments, 1968
- Cylindrical Capacitor as an Analyzer I. Nonrelativistic PartReview of Scientific Instruments, 1967
- Charged Particle Transmission Through Spherical Plate Electrostatic AnalyzersReview of Scientific Instruments, 1967
- Electron Monochromator DesignReview of Scientific Instruments, 1967
- More on the spherical condenser as an analyser I. Nonrelativistic partNuclear Instruments and Methods, 1966
- A new double focusing beta spectrometer and the empirical optimization of its performanceNuclear Instruments and Methods, 1962
- A one-meter-radius iron-free double-focusing π√2 spectrometer for β-ray spectroscopy with a precision of 1:105Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 1960
- Spherical Electrostatic Analyzer for Measurement of Nuclear Reaction EnergiesReview of Scientific Instruments, 1951
- The Focusing of Charged Particles by a Spherical CondenserPhysical Review B, 1938
- On the Analysis of Electronic Velocities by Electrostatic MeansPhysical Review B, 1929