Script concordance testing: From theory to practice: AMEE Guide No. 75
- 18 January 2013
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Medical Teacher
- Vol. 35 (3), 184-193
- https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2013.760036
Abstract
The script concordance test (SCT) is used in health professions education to assess a specific facet of clinical reasoning competence: the ability to interpret medical information under conditions of uncertainty. Grounded in established theoretical models of knowledge organization and clinical reasoning, the SCT has three key design features: (1) respondents are faced with ill-defined clinical situations and must choose between several realistic options; (2) the response format reflects the way information is processed in challenging problem-solving situations; and (3) scoring takes into account the variability of responses of experts to clinical situations. SCT scores are meant to reflect how closely respondents’ ability to interpret clinical data compares with that of experienced clinicians in a given knowledge domain. A substantial body of research supports the SCT's construct validity, reliability, and feasibility across a variety of health science disciplines, and across the spectrum of health professions education from pre-clinical training to continuing professional development. In practice, its performance as an assessment tool depends on careful item development and diligent panel selection. This guide, intended as a primer for the uninitiated in SCT, will cover the basic tenets, theoretical underpinnings, and construction principles governing script concordance testing.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Summative assessment of 5thyear medical students’ clinical reasoning by script concordance test: requirements and challengesBMC Medical Education, 2012
- Script concordance test item response process: The argument for probability versus typicalityAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2011
- Optimization of answer keys for script concordance testing: should we exclude deviant panelists, deviant responses, or neither?Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2011
- Assessment in the Context of Uncertainty Using the Script Concordance Test: More Meaning for ScoresTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 2010
- A Universal Model of Diagnostic ReasoningAcademic Medicine, 2009
- Script concordance testing: more cases or more questions?Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2008
- Script Concordance Tests: Guidelines for ConstructionBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2008
- Scripts and clinical reasoningMedical Education, 2007
- Improving management of musculoskeletal disorders in primary care: the Joint Adventures ProgramClinical Rheumatology, 2006
- A Novel Method of Assessing Clinical Reasoning in Surgical ResidentsSurgical Innovation, 2006