Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Respiratory Specimens Using an Automated DNA Amplification Assay and a Single Tube Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in cclm
- Vol. 36 (8), 597-599
- https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.1998.104
Abstract
The performance of an automated DNA amplification assay (Roche Cobas® Amplicor™ Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Test (aPCR) was compared with an in-house single tube nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR) for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens. Among 385 specimens, 56 were culture positive for mycobacteria (44 positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and 12 positive for nontuberculosis mycobacteria). The diagnostic sensitivities of aPCR and nPCR were 86 % and 91 % whereas a 100 % diagnostic specificity of both assays was attained. By aPCR, inhibitors were detected in 6% of the clinical samples. For nPCR, the usage of a new thermostable DNA polymerase facilitated pre-PCR decontamination using uracil-N-glycosylase and “hot start” in single step procedure. The results of the study indicated that DNA amplification assays, either manual or automated, were rapid and specific tools for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of two automated DNA amplification systems with a manual one-tube nested PCR assay for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosisJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1997
- Single-tube nested PCR in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1996
- Diagnostic Mycobacteriology Laboratory PracticesClinical Infectious Diseases, 1995
- Sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a blind comparison study among seven laboratoriesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1994
- Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of rRNAJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1990
- RAPID DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOSIS BY AMPLIFICATION OF MYCOBACTERIAL DNA IN CLINICAL SAMPLESThe Lancet, 1989