African regional external quality assessment for CD4 T-cell enumeration: Development, outcomes, and performance of laboratories
Open Access
- 28 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry
- Vol. 74B (S1), S69-S79
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.20397
Abstract
Background: An independent African Regional External Quality Assessment Scheme (AFREQAS) was implemented from Johannesburg. The aim was to establish a network of CD4 laboratories supporting HIV/AIDS anti-retroviral therapy programs and improve the quality of regional CD4 testing with EQA assessment, feedback, remedial action, and technical training. The overall performance from 2002 to 2006 (Trials 1–20) is reported, together with cumulative longitudinal performance of the different CD4 methods used. Methods: Stabilized blood samples with “normal” and/or “low” CD4 values were shipped over 20 Trials. Data was analyzed for each trial including trimmed mean, standard deviation, and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV); “Residual” and SDI values were also calculated for each participating laboratory for both absolute CD4 counts (CD4abs) and CD4 percentage of lymphocytes values (CD4%/Ly). Standardized individual laboratory SDI values across 20 trials were analyzed according to CD4 method. Results: Average participation was 91.5%. Overall AFREQAS between-laboratory reproducibility (trimmed %CV) was 10.5% and 9.1% for absolute CD4 and CD4%/Ly, respectively. For the respective CD4abs and CD4%/Ly values in the trials where “normal” material was shipped trimmed %CV of 10.9 and 7.3% were noted, and in “low” value shipments %CV of 13.8% and 12.4% were noted. Cumulative absolute CD4 SDI analysis revealed the best between-laboratory precision amongst FACSCount and PanLeucogating (PLG-CD4) users (both SD of SDI = 12–25%CV and SD(SDI) > 2.2 noted), indicating that additional technical training and/or manufacturer support was required. Conclusions: Participation in an AFREQAS with feedback and remedial action improves the quality of CD4 testing. African laboratory professionals can easily master CD4 counting technologies. However, the introduction of the simplest and most cost-effective methodologies is required to take ownership, and enable the delivery of quality CD4 counts in vast numbers necessary to support expansion of African ART programs. © 2008 Clinical Cytometry SocietyKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring reproducibility of single analysis, single platform CD4 cell counts in a high volume, low resource laboratory setting using sequential bead count ratesCytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry, 2005
- A multicenter evaluation of the PanLeucogating method and the use of generic monoclonal antibody reagents for CD4 enumeration in HIV‐infected patients in ThailandCytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry, 2005
- Affordable CD4 + -T-Cell Counting by Flow Cytometry: CD45 Gating for Volumetric AnalysisClinical and Vaccine Immunology, 2002
- CD45‐assisted PanLeucogating for accurate, cost‐effective dual‐platform CD4+ T‐cell enumerationCytometry, 2002
- Quality control of CD4+ T‐lymphocyte enumeration: Results from the last 9 years of the United Kingdom national external quality assessment scheme for immune monitoring (1993–2001)Cytometry, 2002
- Evaluation of stabilized blood cell products as candidate preparations for quality assessment programs for CD4 T-cell countingCytometry, 2002
- Impact of the international program for quality assessment and standardization for immunological measures relevant to HIV/AIDS: QASICytometry, 2002
- BD Biosciences contributions in CD4 counting and immune status for HIV/AIDSCytometry, 2002
- UK NEQAS for leucocyte immunophenotyping: the first 10 yearsJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2001
- Evaluation of TruCount Absolute-Count Tubes for Determining CD4 and CD8 Cell Numbers in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive AdultsClinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 2000