Examining Prevalence Differences in Three National Surveys of Youth: Impact of Consent Procedures, Mode, and Editing Rules
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Drug Issues
- Vol. 31 (3), 615-642
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260103100303
Abstract
We examined the potential prevalence Impact of differences In consent procedures, mode of administration, and editing protocols in the 1997 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, the Monitoring the Future study, and the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, limiting analyses to 10th and 12th graders. NHSDA's high level of compliance with federal regulations regarding human subjects research, including thorough parental permission prior to adolescent participation, may in part be responsible for the relatively low prevalence rates obtained in this study. Key mode effects which contribute to observed differences across surveys are survey setting and privacy. The two school-based surveys produce higher prevalence estimates than the NHSDA. Although NHSDA prevalence rates Increase with increased interview privacy, the increase Is not enough to account for discrepancies with the school surveys. The procedures used to handle Inconsistent survey responses and to Impute missing data are very different across the three surveys. These differences In editing procedures, however, are unlikely to be responsible for the observed differences in prevalence rates. Based on these analyses, we conclude that the field would benefit from a well-designed experimental study evaluating school vs. household effects as well as the impact of variation In consent procedures. Increased methodological research on the validity of school based drug surveys is also needed.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reports of Smoking in a National SurveyAnnals of Epidemiology, 1998
- Interview Mode Effects in Surveys of Drug and Alcohol Use: A Field ExperimentPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1994
- Evaluation of data screening methods in surveys of adolescents' drug use.Psychological Assessment, 1991
- Obtaining Active Parental Consent via Telephone in Adolescent Substance Abuse Prevention ResearchEvaluation Review, 1990
- Are Self-Reports of Adolescent Deviance Valid? Biochemical Measures, Randomized Response, and the Bogus Pipeline in Smoking BehaviorSocial Forces, 1983
- Are Self-Reports of Adolescent Deviance Valid? Biochemical Measures, Randomized Response, and the Bogus Pipeline in Smoking BehaviorSocial Forces, 1983
- Reliability and Validity of Adolescent Self-Reported Drug Use in a Family-Based Study: A Methodological ReportInternational Journal of the Addictions, 1983
- Different Settings, Different Results? A Comparison of School and Home ResponsesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1979
- The Impact of Informed Consent Regulations On Response Rate and Response BiasSociological Methods & Research, 1977
- A General Consistency Check Procedure for Machine-Readable DataSociological Methods & Research, 1976