Curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from colorectal cancer by complete resection and intraperitoneal chemotherapy
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2001
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is fatal, despite standard systemic chemotherapy. A new approach that combines maximal surgery with maximal regional chemotherapy has potential to cure selected patients who have colorectal PC. The authors have reported the oncologic results of this combined treatment. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective study of 64 patients who had PC arising from colorectal adenocarcinomas, 19 (29.6%) of whom also had other metastases. These patients were treated by complete resection of all detectable tumors and by a 5‐day course of early intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) with mitomycin C, then by 5‐fluorouracil (n = 37), or by intraoperative intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (IPCH) with mitomycin C, alone or combined with cisplatin (n = 27), in 2 separate trials. In the trial of IPCH, aimed at selecting the most reliable procedure in terms of spatial diffusion and thermal homogeneity, the 27 patients were treated with 7 different procedures. The extent of PC was assessed precisely by using a peritoneal index. The median follow‐up period for the entire patient population was 51.7 months. RESULTS The postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 9.3% and 54.6%, respectively. Most severe complications occurred in patients who required extensive cytoreductive surgery. Global and disease‐free survival rates were respectively 60.1% and 54.7% at 2 years and were 27.4% and 18.4% at 5 years. Results were significantly better (P = 0.04) when patients were metastasis‐free (apart from PC) and when the peritoneal index was lower than 16 (P = 0.005). IPCH seemed to be more effective than EPIC for treatment of PC. CONCLUSION This treatment plan, which combined maximal surgery with maximal regional chemotherapy, cured approximately 25% of patients. This strategy was mainly applicable to patients with limited intraperitoneal cancer volume and no extraperitoneal involvement. IPCH proved to be more effective than EPIC but more difficult to use correctly. Future results should improve through routine use of the optimal hyperthermia procedure, with improvements in the composition of instillate, better patient selection, and the reduction in the rate of complications that occurs with physician experience. Cancer 2001;92:71–6. © 2001 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peritoneal carcinomatosis from non-gynecologic malignanciesCancer, 2000
- Peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment with curative intent: the Institut Gustave-Roussy experienceEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 1997
- Observations concerning cancer spread within the peritoneal cavity and concepts supporting an ordered pathophysiologyPublished by Springer Nature ,1996
- Cancer cell seeding during abdominal surgery: Experimental studiesPublished by Springer Nature ,1996
- Dissection by electrocautery with a ball tipJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1994
- Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment and prevention of peritoneal carcinomatosis and sarcomatosisDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1994
- Irrigation does not dislodge or destroy tumor cells adherent to the tumor bedJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1993
- Influence of local hyperthermia on the healing of small intestinal anastomoses in the ratBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Experimental and clinical status of intraperitoneal chemotherapyEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1990
- Thermochemosensitivity: Augmentation by Hyperthermia of Cytotoxicity of Anticancer Drugs against Human Colorectal Cancers, Measured by the Human Tumor Clonogenic AssayOncology, 1988