Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds
- 1 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Dermatology
- Vol. 157 (4), 723-729
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08095.x
Abstract
The frequency of nickel allergy varies between different population groups. Exposure regulation has proven effective in decreasing the frequency. Experimental studies with other allergens have shown a significant relation between patch test reactivity and repeated open application test (ROAT) reactivity. This study was aimed at determining the elicitation threshold in nickel-allergic individuals in a patch test and a ROAT, and comparing the threshold from these two test methods. Twenty nickel-allergic persons were tested with a dilution series of 19 concentrations in a patch test and a dilution series of three concentrations in a ROAT, with duration of up to 21 days. Eighteen persons with no nickel allergy were included as control group for the ROAT. The predicted dose which will elicit a reaction in 10% of allergic individuals was calculated to be 0.78 microg nickel cm(-2) in the patch test. The threshold for the ROAT (in microg nickel cm(-2) per application) was significantly lower than the threshold for the patch test, while the dose-response for the accumulated ROAT dose at 1 week, 2 weeks and 3 weeks was very similar to the patch test dose-response; indeed, there was no statistically significant difference. For elicitation of nickel allergy the elicitation threshold for the patch test is higher than the elicitation threshold (per application) for the ROAT, but is approximately the same as the accumulated elicitation threshold for the ROAT. This may be important for risk assessment based on dose-response results from allergic patients.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experimental nickel elicitation thresholds – a review focusing on occluded nickel exposureContact Dermatitis, 2005
- Chloroatranol, an extremely potent allergen hidden in perfumes: a dose‐response elicitation studyContact Dermatitis, 2003
- Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulationBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2002
- The Time–Dose–Response Relationship for Elicitation of Contact Dermatitis in Isoeugenol Allergic IndividualsToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2001
- Changes in the pattern of sensitization to common contact allergens in Denmark between 1985–86 and 1997–98, with a special view to the effect of preventive strategiesBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2000
- Repeated open application tests (ROAT) in patients allergic to colophony - evaluated visually and with bioengineering techniquesActa Dermato-Venereologica, 1998
- Metal allergy in north Norwegian schoolchildren and its relationship with ear piercing and atopyContact Dermatitis, 1994
- Nickel sensitization and ear piercing in an unselected Danish populationContact Dermatitis, 1993
- Relationship between use test and threshold patch test concentration in patients sensitive to 5‐chloro‐2‐methyl‐4‐isothiazolin‐3‐one and 2‐methyl‐4‐isothiazolin‐3‐one (MCI/MI)Contact Dermatitis, 1991
- Ear piercing – a cause of nickel allergy in schoolgirls?Contact Dermatitis, 1985