Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement
- 21 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 88 (1), 32-38
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20132
Abstract
Background After esophagectomy for cancer, the first choice for reconstruction of the gastrointestinal continuity is by gastric tube. When this is not feasible, a reconstruction by colon interposition can be performed. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life in patients at least 6 months after esophageal cancer resection and colon interposition without signs of recurrent disease. The results were compared with previously published data of patients after esophageal cancer resection and gastric tube reconstruction. Patients and Methods Between January 1993 and January 2002, 36 patients underwent esophageal cancer resection and gastrointestinal reconstruction by colon interposition. A one-time Quality of Life assessment was carried out in 14 patients who were still disease free after a median follow-up of 21 months (mean 35, range 7–97). The patients were visited at home and asked to fill in questionnaires which consisted of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey to assess general quality of life, an adapted Rotterdam Symptom Checklist to assess disease-specific quality of life, a visual analogue scale, and an additional questionnaire concerning other specific effects of the operation. Results All 14 patients returned the completed set of questionnaires. Compared to the previously published results of patients after gastric tube reconstruction patients with a colon interposition scored significantly (P ≤ 0.05) lower in five of the eight subscales of the SF-36 questionnaire (i.e. general health, physical role, vitality, social functioning, and mental health). The most frequent symptoms measured by the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist were early satiety after a meal, dysphagia, diarrhea, loss of sexual interest, and fatigue. Six patients could not independently run their housekeeping and four patients still needed artificial enteral nutrition. Conclusion Based on the SF-36 questionnaire, patients after colon interposition by necessity have a poor general quality of life. Even long after the operation they have a broad spectrum of persisting symptoms. Prior to surgery, patients should be informed about the disabling long-term functional outcome of a colon interposition. J. Surg. Oncol. 2004;88:32–38.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of LifeMedical Care, 2003
- Vagal-Sparing Esophagectomy: A More Physiologic AlternativeAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Disturbed Enterogastric Inhibitory Reflex after Esophageal Resection and Narrow Gastric Tube ReconstructionDigestive Surgery, 1999
- Randomized comparison of prevertebral and retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction after resection of oesophageal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Esophageal replacement by colon interpositionThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Anterior versus posterior reconstruction after transhiatal oesophagectomy: A randomized controlled trialBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Indications, Surgical Technique, and Long-Term Functional Results of Colon Interposition or BypassAnnals of Surgery, 1988
- Motor Activity of Esophageal Substitute (Stomach, Jejunal, and Colon Segments)The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1986
- Colon Interposition for Benign Esophageal Disease: Experience with 23 PatientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1984
- Functional Evaluation of the Interposed Colon as an Esophageal SubstituteAnnals of Surgery, 1976