Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review
- Vol. 20 (3), 571-610
- https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Abstract
This article synthesizes the large but diverse literature on organizational legitimacy, highlighting similarities and disparities among the leading strategic and institutional approaches. The analysis identifies three primary forms of legitimacy: pragmatic, based on audience self-interest: moral, based on normative approval; and cognitive, based on comprehensibility and taken-for-grantedness. The article then examines strategies for gaining, maintaining, and repairing legitimacy of each type, suggesting both the promises and the pitfalls of such instrumental manipulations.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Impact of Introducing Estimates of the Future on International Comparability in Earnings ExpectationsEuropean Accounting Review, 2010
- The Interactive Effect of Internal and External Factors on a Proactive Environmental Strategy and its Influence on a Firm's PerformanceJournal of Business Ethics, 2009
- Social structure and organizationsPublished by Emerald Publishing ,2004
- Managing Organizational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry: The Construction and Effectiveness of Verbal AccountsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1994
- Organizational Enactments and Conformity to Environmental PrescriptionsHuman Relations, 1992
- Interorganizational RelationsAnnual Review of Sociology, 1985
- The Justification of Organizational PerformanceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational FieldsAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- Organizational Change in the American Foreign Service, 1925-1965: The Utility of Cohort AnalysisAmerican Sociological Review, 1978