Comparison between pressure-volume and dewpoint-hygrometry techniques for determining the water relations characteristics of grass and legume leaves

Abstract

The water relations characteristics of three grass species (Panicum maximum var. trichoglume, Cenchrus ciliaris, Heteropogon contortus), and a legume (Macroptilium atropurpureum) grown in the field were measured using both a modified pressure/volume technique with pressure bomb measurements on single leaves and a dewpoint hygrometry technique applied to fresh and to frozen and thawed leaf discs. The two techniques agreed well in the estimates of osmotic potential at full turgor and the water potential at zero turgor. However, for parameters such as the relative water content at zero turgor, bound water and bulk modulus of elasticity there was a poor correlation between the estimates from the two methods. The pressure/volume technique gave less variable results and is more convenient for field use than the hygrometry technique. The determination of the modulus of elasticity from various functions relating pressure potential to relative water content is discussed.