Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity
Top Cited Papers
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 34 (12), 2045-2051
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200212000-00027
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was 1) to evaluate agreement between dual-mode CSA accelerometer outputs and Yamax pedometer outputs assessed concurrently under free-living conditions; 2) to determine the relationship between pedometer-steps per day and CSA-time spent in inactivity and in light-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity activities; and 3) to identify a value of pedometer-steps per day that corresponds with a minimum of 30 CSA-min x d(-1) of moderate ambulatory activity. Data were analyzed from 52 participants (27 men, 25 women; mean age = 38.2 +/- 12.0 yr; mean BMI = 26.4 +/- 4.5 kg x m(-2)) who were enrolled in the International Physical Activity Questionnaire study and wore both motion sensors during waking hours for 7 consecutive days. Participants averaged 415.0+/-159.5 CSA-counts x min(-1) x d(-1), 357,601 +/- 138,425 CSA-counts x d(-1), 11,483 +/- 3,856 CSA-steps x d(-1), and 9,638 +/- 4,030 pedometer-steps x d(-1). There was a strong relationship between all CSA outputs and pedometer outputs (r = 0.74-0.86). The mean difference in steps detected between instruments was 1845+/-2116 steps x d(-1) (CSA > pedometer; t = 6.29, P < 0.0001). There were distinct differences (effect sizes >0.80) in mean CSA-time (min x d(-1)) in moderate and vigorous activity with increasing pedometer-determined activity quartiles; no differences were noted for inactivity or light activity. Approximately 33 CSA-min x d(-1) of moderate activity corresponded with 8000 pedometer-steps x d(-1). Differences in mean steps per day detected may be due to differences in set instrument sensitivity thresholds and/or attachment. Additional studies with different populations are needed to confirm a recommended number of steps per day associated with the duration and intensity of public health recommendations for ambulatory activity.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Seasonal Variation in Household, Occupational, and Leisure Time Physical Activity: Longitudinal Analyses from the Seasonal Variation of Blood Cholesterol StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the fieldMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2000
- Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activityMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2000
- Comparisons of four methods of estimating physical activity in adult womenMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2000
- Validity and Reliability issues in Objective Monitoring of Physical ActivityResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000
- Comparing physical activity assessment methods in the Seasonal Variation of Blood Cholesterol StudyMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2000
- Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometerMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1998
- Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walkedMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1996
- Physical Activity and Public HealthJAMA, 1995
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986