Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system † †Declaration of interest: The ANTS system was developed under research funding from the Scottish Council for Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, now part of NHS Education for Scotland, through grants to the University of Aberdeen from September 1999 to August 2003. The views presented in this paper are those of the authors and should not be taken to represent the position or policy of the funding body.
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Vol. 90 (5), 580-588
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeg112
Abstract
Non-technical skills are critical for good anaesthetic practice but are not addressed explicitly in normal training. Realization of the need to train and assess these skills is growing, but these activities must be based on properly developed skills frameworks and validated measurement tools. A prototype behavioural marker system was developed using human factors research techniques. The aim of this study was to conduct an experimental evaluation to establish its basic psychometric properties and usability. The Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) system prototype comprises four skill categories (task management, team working, situation awareness, and decision making) divided into 15 elements, each with example behaviours. To investigate its experimental validity, reliably and usability, 50 consultant anaesthetists were trained to use the ANTS system. They were asked to rate the behaviour of a target anaesthetist using the prototype system in eight videos of simulated anaesthetic scenarios. Data were collected from the ratings forms and an evaluation questionnaire. The results showed that the system is complete, and that the skills are observable and can be rated with acceptable levels of agreement and accuracy. The internal consistency of the system appeared sound, and responses regarding usability were very positive. The findings of the evaluation indicated that the ANTS system has a satisfactory level of validity, reliability and usability in an experimental setting, provided users receive adequate training. It is now ready to be tested in real training environments, so that full guidelines can be developed for its integration into the anaesthetic curriculum.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rating non-technical skills: developing a behavioural marker system for use in anaesthesiaCognition, Technology & Work, 2004
- Developing a Method for Evaluating Crew Resource Management Skills: A European PerspectiveThe International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2002
- Assessing and Improving Evaluation of Aircrew PerformanceThe International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2002
- Crew resource management: improving team work in high reliability industriesTeam Performance Management, 2002
- The role of non-technical skills in anaesthesia: a review of current literatureBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002
- Assessment instruments used during anaesthetic simulation: review of published studiesBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001
- Behavioral Markers for Crew Resource Management: A Review of Current PracticeThe International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2001
- rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993
- Critical decision method for eliciting knowledgeIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1989
- Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984