Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice
Open Access
- 1 October 1999
- Vol. 45 (Supplement), iv1-iv11
- https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.45.2008.iv1
Abstract
Advances in medical technology and especially in imaging, together with advances in drug therapy have greatly influenced the diagnosis and management of hepatic disease and as a consequence the indications for liver biopsy are changing. In 1991 the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), together with the Royal College of Physicians of London, undertook a nationwide audit of percutaneous liver biopsy in 189 health districts.3 It is clear from this audit and from reviewing the literature that there continue to be significant differences in clinical practice with respect to liver biopsy across the United Kingdom, and a lack of standardised protocols between institutions. These guidelines examine the evidence for methods of liver biopsy in adults.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- A combined management protocol for patients with coagulation disorders infected with hepatitis C virusBritish Journal of Haematology, 1996
- Variation between centers in technique and guidelines for liver biopsyLiver International, 1996
- Liver biopsy in liver transplantation: no additional risk of infections in patients with choledochojejunostomyJournal of Hepatology, 1996
- Is day case liver biopsy underutilised?Gut, 1995
- Midazolam sedation for percutaneous liver biopsyDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1993
- Primary biliary cirrhosisJournal of Hepatology, 1993
- Raised gamma-glutamyltransferase activity and the need for liver biopsy.BMJ, 1991
- Complications following percutaneous liver biopsyJournal of Hepatology, 1986
- Intrahepatic hematoma after aspiration liver biopsyDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1981
- Bleeding after liver biopsy does not correlate with indices of peripheral coagulationDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1981