Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Information Systems Research
- Vol. 12 (3), 240-259
- https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709
Abstract
This paper puts forward arguments in favor of a pluralist approach to IS research. Rather than advocating a single paradigm, be it interpretive or positivist, or even a plurality of paradigms within the discipline as a whole, it suggests that research results will be richer and more reliable if different research methods, preferably from different (existing) paradigms, are routinely combined together. The paper is organized into three sections after the Introduction. In 脗§2, the main arguments for the desirability of multimethod research are put forward, while 脗§3 discusses its feasibility in theory and practice. 脗§4 outlines two frameworks that are helpful in designing mixed-method research studies. These are illustrated with a critical evaluation of three examples of empirical research.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- The contribution of critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for OR/MS and systemsJournal of the Operational Research Society, 2000
- Rigor and Relevance: Careers on the LineMIS Quarterly, 1999
- Putting Soft OR Methods to Work: Information Systems Strategy Development at Richards BayJournal of the Operational Research Society, 1996
- Putting Soft OR Methods to Work: Information Systems Strategy Development at Sainsbury'sJournal of the Operational Research Society, 1995
- Combining hard, soft, and critical methodologies in systems research: The cultural constraintsSystems Research, 1995
- The pragmatic dimensionQuality & Quantity, 1994
- Research issues in information systemsJournal of Information Technology, 1993
- Recent Developments in Critical Management ScienceJournal of the Operational Research Society, 1992
- Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory BuildingAcademy of Management Review, 1990
- Can the field of MIS be disciplined?Communications of the ACM, 1989