Which Physician and Practice Characteristics are Associated With Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Depressive and Anxiety Disorders?
- 1 March 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 48 (3), 240-248
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181ca27f6
Abstract
Background: Research on quality of care for depressive and anxiety disorders has reported low rates of adherence to evidence-based depression and anxiety guidelines. To improve this care, we need a better understanding of the factors determining guideline adherence. Objective: To investigate how practice- and professional-related factors are associated with adherence to these guidelines. Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Participants: A total of 665 patients with a composite interview diagnostic instrument diagnosis of depressive or anxiety disorders, and 62 general practitioners from 21 practices participated. Measures: Actual care data were derived from electronic medical record data. The measurement of guideline adherence was based on performance indicators derived from evidence-based guidelines. Practice-, professional-, and patient-related characteristics were measured with questionnaires. The characteristics associated with guideline adherence were assessed by multivariate multilevel regression analysis. Results: A number of practice and professional characteristics showed a significant univariate association with guideline adherence. The multivariate multilevel analyses revealed that, after controlling for patient characteristics, higher rates of guideline adherence were associated with stronger confidence in depression identification, less perceived time limitations, and less perceived barriers for guideline implementation. These professional-related determinants differed among the overall concept of guideline adherence and the various treatment options. Conclusions: This study showed that rates of adherence to guidelines on depressive and anxiety disorders were not associated with practice characteristics, but to some extent with physician characteristics. Although most of the identified professional-related determinants are very difficult to change, our results give some directions for improving depression and anxiety care.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of mental health services for anxiety, mood, and substance disorders in 17 countries in the WHO world mental health surveysThe Lancet, 2007
- Treatment adequacy for anxiety and depressive disorders in six European countriesThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2007
- Twelve-Month Use of Mental Health Services in the United StatesArchives of General Psychiatry, 2005
- Quality of Care for Primary Care Patients With Anxiety DisordersAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2004
- Diagnose depressie niet zo betrouwbaar te stellenHuisarts en wetenschap, 2004
- Zout en bloeddrukHuisarts en wetenschap, 2003
- The Quality of Care for Depressive and Anxiety Disorders in the United StatesArchives of General Psychiatry, 2001
- Recent care of common mental disorders in the united statesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2000
- Prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the general population: results of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS)Social psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 1998
- Health care costs associated with depressive and anxiety disorders in primary careAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1995