Strategies for biological monitoring of exposure for contemporary-use pesticides
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Toxicology and Industrial Health
- Vol. 15 (1-2), 169-180
- https://doi.org/10.1177/074823379901500114
Abstract
Pesticides are used on a massive scale in the United States. The widespread use of these pesticides has made it virtually impossible for the average person to avoid exposure at some level. Generally, it is believed that low-level exposure to these pesticides does not produce acute toxic effects; however, various cancers and other noncancer health endpoints have been associated with chronic exposure to several groups of pesticides. Therefore, it is imperative that well-designed studies investigate the potential relationship between contemporary pesticide exposure and health effects. For these studies to be accurate, reliable methods for determining individual exposure must be used. Biological monitoring is a useful tool for assessing exposure to some contemporary pesticides. As with any analytical method, biological monitoring entails many difficulties, but, in many instances, they can be overcome by the logical use of available information and information acquired in carefully designed studies. At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), we have acquired extensive experience in the development and application of specific techniques for biological monitoring of a variety of toxicants, including many of the contemporary-use pesticides. We have used these methods to measure the internal dose of pesticides received by people in acute and chronic incidents resulting from both environmental and industrial exposure. Additionally, we have established normative values, or reference ranges, of several pesticides based on measurements of their metabolites in the urine of randomly selected adults in the US population. These data have been successfully used to distinguish overt exposures from `background' exposure. In this paper, we present several examples of the usefulness of biological monitoring in urine and blood and describe the difficulties involved with developing methods in these matrices. We also present a general strategy, considerations, and recommendations for developing biological monitoring techniques for measuring the internal dose of contemporary-use pesticides.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantification of non‐persistent pesticides in human samples by isotope dilution mass spectrometryToxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 1998
- The Use of Reference Range Concentrations in Environmental Health InvestigationsPublished by American Chemical Society (ACS) ,1996
- Selected Analytical Methods Used At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for Measuring Environmental Pollutants in SerumToxicology and Industrial Health, 1996
- Using biological monitoring to assess human exposure to priority toxicants.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1995
- The presence of 1-naphthol in the urine of industrial workers exposed to naphthalene.Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1994
- Absorption and Metabolism of 2-Chloro-2,6-diethyl-N-(butoxymethyl)acetanilide (Butachlor) in Human Skin in VitroToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1993
- Pentachlorophenol measurements in body fluids of people in log homes and workplacesArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1989
- Residues of chlorinated phenols and phenoxy acid herbicides in the urine of Arkansas childrenArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1989
- Forestry workers involved in aerial application of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D): Exposure and urinary excretionArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1985
- Applicator exposure to 2,4‐D, dicamba, and a dicamba isomerJournal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 1981