Resampling Methods in Sparse Sampling Situations in Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Studies
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Vol. 87 (3), 372-378
- https://doi.org/10.1021/js970114h
Abstract
Toxicokinetic studies often require destructive sampling and the determination of drug concentrations in the various organs. Classically, the corresponding information is summarized in one mean concentration-time profile, which is regarded as representative for the animal population. On the basis of a mean profile, only estimates of the secondary pharmacokinetic parameters (for example AUC, t1/2) but no variability measures may be obtained. In this paper two resampling techniques are contrasted to Bailer's approach. The results obtained show that the resampling techniques can be considered a reliable alternative to Bailer's approach for the estimation of the standard error of the AUC t(k)0 in the case of normally distributed concentration data. They can be extended to the estimation of a variety of other secondary pharmacokinetic parameters and their respective standard deviations. One disadvantage with Bailer's method is its restriction to linear functions of the concentrations. On the other hand, using the population approach, prior knowledge of the underlying pharmacokinetic model is necessary. The resampling techniques discussed here, the "pseudoprofile-based bootstrap" (PpbB) and the "pooled data bootstrap" (PDB), are noncompartmental approaches. They are applicable under nonnormal data constellations and permit the estimation of the usual secondary pharmacokinetic parameters along with their standard deviations, standard errors, and other statistical measures. To assess the accuracy, precision, and robustness of the resampling estimators, theoretical data from three different pharmacokinetic models with different add-on errors (up to 100% variability) were analyzed. Even for the data sets with high variability, the parameters calculated with resampling techniques differ not more than 10% from the true values. Thus, in the case of data that are not normally distributed or when additional secondary pharmacokinetic parameters and their variability are to be estimated, the resampling methods are powerful tools in the safety assessment in preclinical pharmacokinetics and in toxicokinetics where generally sparse data situations are given.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- ANALYSIS OF PSEUDO‐PROFILES IN ORGAN PHARMACOKINETICS AND TOXICOKINETICSStatistics in Medicine, 1995
- An evaluation of numerical integration algorithms for the estimation of the area under the curve (AUC) in pharmacokinetic studiesBiopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition, 1995
- Estimation of Variance for AUC in Animal StudiesJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1993
- Bootstrap Technology and ApplicationsTechnometrics, 1992
- Optimum numerical integration methods for estimation of area-under-the-curve (AUC) and area-under-the-moment-curve (AUMC)Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1992
- The estimation of moments: A technical noteJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1989
- Testing for the equality of area under the curves when using destructive measurement techniquesJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1988
- Approaches to regression analysis with multiple measurements from individual sampling unitsJournal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 1986
- Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical AccuracyStatistical Science, 1986
- Estimation of Population Pharmacokinetic Parameters Using Destructively Obtained Experimental Data: A Simulation Study of the One-Compartment Open ModelDrug Metabolism Reviews, 1984