Body orientation and face orientation: two factors controlling apes? begging behavior from humans
Top Cited Papers
- 18 March 2004
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Animal Cognition
- Vol. 7 (4), 216-223
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-004-0214-2
Abstract
A number of animal species have evolved the cognitive ability to detect when they are being watched by other individuals. Precisely what kind of information they use to make this determination is unknown. There is particular controversy in the case of the great apes because different studies report conflicting results. In experiment 1, we presented chimpanzees, orangutans, and bonobos with a situation in which they had to request food from a human observer who was in one of various attentional states. She either stared at the ape, faced the ape with her eyes closed, sat with her back towards the ape, or left the room. In experiment 2, we systematically crossed the observer’s body and face orientation so that the observer could have her body and/or face oriented either towards or away from the subject. Results indicated that apes produced more behaviors when they were being watched. They did this not only on the basis of whether they could see the experimenter as a whole, but they were sensitive to her body and face orientation separately. These results suggest that body and face orientation encode two different types of information. Whereas face orientation encodes the observer’s perceptual access, body orientation encodes the observer’s disposition to transfer food. In contrast to the results on body and face orientation, only two of the tested subjects responded to the state of the observer’s eyes.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘Unwilling’ versus ‘unable’: chimpanzees’ understanding of human intentional actionDevelopmental Science, 2004
- Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2003
- Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jaysNature, 2001
- Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know?Animal Behaviour, 2001
- Differential use of vocal and gestural communication by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in response to the attentional status of a human (Homo sapiens).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2001
- Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not seeAnimal Behaviour, 2000
- Non-human primate theories of (non-human primate) minds: some issues concerning the origins of mind-readingPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- MindblindnessPublished by MIT Press ,1995
- Production and comprehension of referential pointing by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1994
- Learning to outwit a competitor in mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus torquatus).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1994