Treatment of suspected fetal macrosomia: A cost-effectiveness analysis
- 30 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 193 (3), 1035-1039
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.030
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk Factors for Bladder Injury During Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Birth injuries of the brachial plexusPediatric Clinics of North America, 2004
- Vaginal birth after cesarean section: Trial of labor or repeat cesarean section? A decision analysisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003
- Perinatal implications of shoulder dystociaPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2000
- Prophylactic cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography—A Faustian bargain?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: A randomized studyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1997
- Are labor abnormalities more common in shoulder dystocia?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Macrosomatia and Ultrasonography: What Is the Problem?Southern Medical Journal, 1993
- Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighing ≥4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- Multiple caesarean sections: outcomes and complicationsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988