Some Characteristics Of The G Index Of Agreement
- 1 January 1968
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Multivariate Behavioral Research
- Vol. 3 (1), 107-114
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0301_7
Abstract
Several uses of the G index of agreement are discussed for both Q- and R-techniques. It is shown that the index is meaningful and is not sensitive either to changes in having direction (for profile analysis) or to marginal inequalities for dichotomous data.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Measure Of Similarity Between Individuals When Scoring Directions Of Variables Are ArbitraryMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1967
- A REPLY TO JASPER HOLLEY'S DEFENSE OF THE G INDEXScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1967
- PHILIP LEVY AND THE G INDEX — A FINAL REPLYScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1967
- COMMENTS ON FACTORING DICHOTOMOUS SCORE MATRICESScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1966
- A REPLY TO PHILIP LEVY‐IN DEFENSE OF THE G INDEXScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1966
- PROPERTIES OF THE HOLLEY-GUILFORD ‘G INDEX OF AGREEMENT’ IN R AND Q FACTOR ANALYSISScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1966
- NOTE ON THE DOUBLE CENTERING OF DICHOTOMIZED MATRICESScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1966
- A Note on the G Index of AgreementEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1964
- A Reply to some Comments of Norman CliffEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1964
- A NOTE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN Q AND R FACTORSScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1964