Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 15 (3), 152-153
- https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.018432
Abstract
“Dumbing down” the scientific expectation of journals and readers regarding QI research may not be the answerKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health Industry Practices That Create Conflicts of InterestJAMA, 2006
- Nurse Staffing In Hospitals: Is There A Business Case For Quality?Health Affairs, 2006
- Unexpected Increased Mortality After Implementation of a Commercially Sold Computerized Physician Order Entry SystemPediatrics, 2005
- Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus projectQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2005
- Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Electronic Alerts to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism among Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- The Unintended Consequences of Publicly Reporting Quality InformationJAMA, 2005
- Effect of Reducing Interns' Work Hours on Serious Medical Errors in Intensive Care UnitsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Effects of a Quality Improvement Collaborative on the Outcome of Care of Patients with HIV Infection: The EQHIV StudyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Physician Staffing Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill PatientsJAMA, 2002