Warning Messages: Will the Consumer Bother to Look?
- 1 October 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting
- Vol. 27 (11), 950-954
- https://doi.org/10.1177/154193128302701118
Abstract
One way to encourage the safe use of potentially hazardous household products is to provide a warning message on the label. But will the consumer bother to look at the message? In Experiment 1 subjects were asked to imagine themselves purchasing a number of household products. They then rated the products on skin-contact hazard, inhalation hazard, swallowing hazard and overall hazard. They also rated the likelihood that they would look for a warning and how familiar they were with the product. In Experiment 2 more detailed information about familiarity with products was collected along with hazard ratings. Together the results of the two experiments indicate that subjects do discriminate products on overall hazard. They also rate skin contact hazard lowest, inhalation hazard intermediate and swallowing hazard highest. The more hazardous they perceive a product, the more likely they will look for a warning. Further, females are more likely to look for warnings than males. Also, perceived hazard varies inversely with familiarity. The principal conclusion is that factors such as perceived hazard, familiarity and sex influence the consumer's decision to look for a warning message on the labels of potentially hazardous household products.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Some factors determining when instructions will be readErgonomics, 1982
- Field testing of consumer safety signs: the comprehension of pictorially presented messagesApplied Ergonomics, 1981
- “The instructions clearly state …” can't people read?Applied Ergonomics, 1981
- Language and ergonomicsApplied Ergonomics, 1977
- Interpretability of graphic symbols as a function of context and experience factors.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975