Depression in Primary Care—More like Asthma Than Appendicitis: The Michigan Depression Project
Open Access
- 1 November 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 42 (9), 966-973
- https://doi.org/10.1177/070674379704200909
Abstract
Objective: To explore the relationships between detection, treatment, and outcome of depression in the primary care setting, based upon results from the Michigan Depression Project (MDP). Methods: A weighted sample of 425 adult family practice patients completed a comprehensive battery of questionnaires exploring stress, social support, overall health, health care utilization, treatment attitudes, self-rated levels of stress and depression, along with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III (SCID), which served as the criterion standard for diagnosis. A comparison sample of 123 depressed psychiatric outpatients received the same assessment battery. Family practice patients received repeated assessment of depressive symptoms, stress, social support, and health care utilization over a period of up to 60 months of longitudinal follow-up. Results: The central MDP findings confirm that significant differences in past history, severity, and impairment exist between depressed psychiatric and family practice patients, that detection rates are significantly higher for severely depressed primary care patients, and that clinicians use clinical cues such as past history, distress, and severity of symptoms to “detect” depression in patients at intermediate and mild levels of severity. As well, there is a lack of association between detection and improved outcome in primary care patients. Conclusion: These results call into question the assumption that “depression is depression” irrespective of the setting and physician, and they are consistent with a model of depressive disorder as a subacute or chronic condition characterized by clinical parameters of severity, staging, and comorbidity, similar to asthma. This new model can guide further investigation into the epidemiology and management of mood disorders in the primary care setting.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shortening the CES–D to improve its ability to detect cases of depression.Psychological Assessment, 1997
- Competing demands in psychosocial care: A model for the identification and treatment of depressive disorders in primary careGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 1997
- Recognition and treatment of mental illness in primary careGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 1995
- Recognition, management, and outcomes of depression in primary careArchives of Family Medicine, 1995
- Prevalence, nature, and comorbidity of depressive disorders in primary careGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 1994
- Epidemiology of depression in primary careGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 1992
- Mental health intervention programs in primary care: their scientific basisJournal of Affective Disorders, 1991
- Depressive Symptomatology and Medical Co-Morbidity in a Primary Care ClinicThe International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 1990
- The Epidemiology of Depression in Medical CareThe International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 1988
- The CES-D ScaleApplied Psychological Measurement, 1977