The application of enhanced parallel gatekeeping strategies
- 15 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 24 (9), 1385-1397
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2005
Abstract
The parallel gatekeeping strategy proposed by Dmitrienko et al. (Statist. Med. 2003; 22:2387–2400) provides a flexible framework for the pursuit of strong control on study wise type I error rate. This paper further explores the application of the weighted Simes parallel gatekeeping procedure recommended by Dmitrienko et al. and proposes some modifications to it to better incorporate the interrelationships of different hypotheses in actual clinical trials and to achieve better power performance. We first propose a simple method to quantitatively control the impact of secondary tests on the testing of primary hypotheses. We then introduce a matched gatekeeping procedure to exemplify how to address special relationships between individual primary and secondary tests following the parallel gatekeeping framework. Our simulation study demonstrates that the enhanced gatekeeping procedures generally result in more powerful tests than the parallel gatekeeping procedure in Dmitrienko et al. whenever applicable. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gatekeeping strategies for clinical trials that do not require all primary effects to be significantStatistics in Medicine, 2003
- Mitoxantrone in progressive multiple sclerosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, multicentre trialThe Lancet, 2002
- The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependencyThe Annals of Statistics, 2001
- Practical Guidelines for Multiplicity Adjustment in Clinical TrialsControlled Clinical Trials, 2000
- Multiple Hypotheses Testing with WeightsScandinavian Journal of Statistics, 1997
- Problems of multiplicity in clinical trialsJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 1994
- On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of varianceBiometrika, 1976