Percentage of Patients with Preventable Adverse Drug Reactions and Preventability of Adverse Drug Reactions – A Meta-Analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (3), e33236
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033236
Abstract
Numerous observational studies suggest that preventable adverse drug reactions are a significant burden in healthcare, but no meta-analysis using a standardised definition for adverse drug reactions exists. The aim of the study was to estimate the percentage of patients with preventable adverse drug reactions and the preventability of adverse drug reactions in adult outpatients and inpatients. Studies were identified through searching Cochrane, CINAHL, EMBASE, IPA, Medline, PsycINFO and Web of Science in September 2010, and by hand searching the reference lists of identified papers. Original peer-reviewed research articles in English that defined adverse drug reactions according to WHO’s or similar definition and assessed preventability were included. Disease or treatment specific studies were excluded. Meta-analysis on the percentage of patients with preventable adverse drug reactions and the preventability of adverse drug reactions was conducted. Data were analysed from 16 original studies on outpatients with 48797 emergency visits or hospital admissions and from 8 studies involving 24128 inpatients. No studies in primary care were identified. Among adult outpatients, 2.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2–3.2%) had preventable adverse drug reactions and 52% (95% CI: 42–62%) of adverse drug reactions were preventable. Among inpatients, 1.6% (95% CI: 0.1–51%) had preventable adverse drug reactions and 45% (95% CI: 33–58%) of adverse drug reactions were preventable. This meta-analysis corroborates that preventable adverse drug reactions are a significant burden to healthcare among adult outpatients. Among both outpatients and inpatients, approximately half of adverse drug reactions are preventable, demonstrating that further evidence on prevention strategies is required. The percentage of patients with preventable adverse drug reactions among inpatients and in primary care is largely unknown and should be investigated in future research.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methods for Assessing the Preventability of Adverse Drug EventsDrug Safety, 2012
- The frequency of adverse drug reaction related admissions according to method of detection, admission urgency and medical department specialtyBMC Clinical Pharmacology, 2009
- Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospital In-Patients: A Prospective Analysis of 3695 Patient-EpisodesPLOS ONE, 2009
- Incidence, severity and preventability of medication-related visits to the emergency department: a prospective studyCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2008
- The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic reviewQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2008
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Evaluation of the prevalence and economic burden of adverse drug reactions presenting to the medical emergency department of a tertiary referral centre: a prospective studyBMC Clinical Pharmacology, 2007
- The "To Err is Human" report and the patient safety literatureQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2006
- Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patientsBMJ, 2004
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986