The new Richmond HRR pseudoisochromatic test for colour vision is better than the Ishihara test
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Clinical and Experimental Optometry
- Vol. 89 (2), 73-80
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00015.x
Abstract
The Hardy-Rand-Rittler (HRR) pseudoisochromatic test for colour vision is highly regarded but has long been out of print. Richmond Products produced a new edition in 2002 that has been re-engineered to rectify shortcomings of the original test. This study is a validation trial of the new test using a larger sample and different criteria of evaluation from those of the previously reported validation study. The Richmond HRR test was given to 100 consecutively presenting patients with abnormal colour vision and 50 patients with normal colour vision. Colour vision was diagnosed using the Ishihara test, the Farnsworth D15 test, the Medmont C-100 test and the Type 1 Nagel anomaloscope. The Richmond HRR test has a sensitivity of 1.00 and a specificity of 0.975 when the criterion for failing is two or more errors with the screening plates. Sensitivity and specificity become 0.98 and 1.0, respectively, when the fail criterion is three or more errors. Those with red-green colour vision deficiency were correctly classified as protan or deutan on 86 per cent of occasions, with 11 per cent unclassified and three per cent incorrectly classified. All those graded as having a 'mild' defect by the Richmond HRR test passed the Farnsworth D15 test and had an anomaloscope range of 30 or less. Not all dichromats were classified as 'strong', which was one of the goals of the re-engineering and those graded as 'medium' and 'strong' included dichromats and those who have a mild colour vision deficiency based on the results of the Farnsworth D15 test and the anomaloscope range. The test is as good as the Ishihara test for detection of the red-green colour vision deficiencies but unlike the Ishihara, also has plates for the detection of the tritan defects. Its classification of protans and deutans is useful but the Medmont C-100 test is better. Those graded as 'mild' by the Richmond HRR test can be regarded as having a mild colour vision defect but a 'medium' or 'strong' grading needs to be interpreted in conjunction with other tests such as the Farnsworth D15 and the anomaloscope. The Richmond HRR test could be the test of choice for clinicians who wish to use a single test for colour vision.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does the Farnsworth D15 test predict the ability to name colours?Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 2003
- Can clinical colour vision tests be used to predict the results of the Farnsworth lantern test?Vision Research, 1998
- Clinical use of the American Optical Company (Hardy, Rand and Rittler) pseudoisochromatic plates for red-green colour deficiencyOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1997
- Clinical use of the American Optical Company (Hardy, Rand and Rittler) pseudoisochromatic plates for red-green colour deficiencyOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1997
- The C‐100:a new dichotomiser of colour vision defectivesClinical and Experimental Optometry, 1992
- HOW GOOD IS THE H-R-R TEST FOR COLOR BLINDNESS?Optometry and Vision Science, 1959
- COLOUR VISION SURVEY: USING THE ISHIHARA, DVORINE, BOSTROM AND KUGELBERG, BOSTROM, AND AMERICAN-OPTICAL HARDY-RAND-RITTLER TESTSBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 1958
- H–R–R Polychromatic Plates*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1954
- Effect of Illumination in Testing Color Vision with Pseudo-isochromatic Plates*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1952
- The Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue and Dichotomous Tests for Color Vision*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1943