Prevention of perioperative deep vein thrombosis in general surgery: A multicentre double blind study comparing two doses of Logiparin and standard heparin
- 1 April 1991
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 78 (4), 412-416
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800780410
Abstract
A total of 1290 patients were enrolled in a randomized multicentre double blind study in order to investigate the use of two doses of a new low molecular weight heparin, Logiparin®, in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in general surgery. Patients who were included had no contraindication to heparin therapy and had at least one of the recognized risk factors for DVT. Patients were randomized to receive unfractionated heparin (UH) 5000 units b.d., Logiparin 2500 units daily or Logiparin 3500 units daily. Each treatment was given subcutaneously 2h before surgery and continued for 7–10 days. Daily 125I‐labelled fibrinogen uptake tests (FUTs) were performed from day 2 to day 7 to detect DVT, and phleboangiography was used to confirm the diagnosis. The wound was examined on a daily basis to check for haematoma formation, and all patients were followed up for 1 month after operation. All three treatment arms were well matched for age, sex, weight, diagnosis and type of operation performed. The three major inclusion criteria in the trial were malignancy, age over 60 years and a history of varicose veins. Positive FUTs (UH=4·2 per cent, Logiparin 2500 units daily = 7·9 per cent, Logiparin 3500 units daily = 3·7 per cent) and positive angiograms (UH=3·0 per cent, Logiparin 2500 units daily = 5·6 per cent, Logiparin 3500 units daily = 2·3 per cent) were significantly more common in the Logiparin 2500 units daily group than in the UH and Logiparin 3500 units daily groups. The rates of major complications (severe haemorrhage, death, pulmonary embolism, reintervention) were similar in the three groups.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Studies with Low Molecular Weight Heparins in the Prevention and Treatment of Venous ThromboembolismAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1989
- Comparison of a low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing abdominal surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Reduction in Fatal Pulmonary Embolism and Venous Thrombosis by Perioperative Administration of Subcutaneous HeparinNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (Enoxaparin) to Prevent Deep-Vein Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Elective Hip SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Sensitivity of125J-fibrinogen uptake test for diagnosis of established venous thrombosis in heparinized patientsKlinische Wochenschrift, 1986
- Low molecular weight heparin once daily compared with conventional low-dose heparin twice daily. A prospective double-blind multicentre trial on prevention of postoperative thrombosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986
- Efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (CY216) in preventing postoperative venous thrombo-embolism: A co-operative studyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985
- DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSISBritish Medical Bulletin, 1978
- Diagnosis of Venous Thrombosis in the Lower LimbsUpsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 1973