Evaluation of Effects of Sexual Steroids on the Hypothalamic-Pituitary System of Animals and Man

Abstract

Specific neuroendocrine regulatory mechanisms in rats and mice are known to be involved in the development of pituitary tumours (prolactinomas) in systemic tolerance and carcinogenicity studies of oestrogens, certain progestagens and their combinations. However, the susceptibility of the strain used seems to be of decisive importance. High doses of oestrogens may also, in special cases, stimulate development of PRL cell hyperplasia and tumours in humans¹. In other species such as the hamster long-term treatment with oestrogens results in hyperplastic and neoplastic changes in MSH-producing cells of the pars intermedia of the pituitary gland. On the other hand, in the dog and monkey, steroid-related pituitary tumours were not observed, in spite of long-term treatment with high doses of oestrogens, progestagens and their combinations. The capability of certain progestagens to stimulate canine GH secretion seems to play a major role as mediator of the species-specific progestagen-induced changes (mammary tumours, diabetes- and acromegalic-like syndrome) in the beagle dog. These progestagens also seem to have, in addition to their antigonadotrophic properties, an inhibitory effect on CRH-ACTH and TRH-TSH activity in the beagle bitch. These effects can be demonstrated in both the hypothalamic-pituitary system and in the corresponding peripheral target organs. These findings in the dog were not comparable to the situation in other species including man. The extent to which all these results in different species are applicable to other species depends on whether their neuroendocrine control systems are qualitatively and/or quantitatively similar. The physiological significance of the different pituitary hormones, sensitivity of target organs as well as a certain genetic disposition in the different species should also be considered. All these factors can vary from species to species. From these facts, it can be easily appreciated that results of experiments on different species with a substance possessing the same quality of biological effect in these species (e.g., oestrogen, progestagen, etc.) can only be compared when the experimental procedure takes account of the effect of this substance on the neuroendocrine system of the different species, and when dosage, mode of administration and period of treatment are correspondingly matched to the physiological conditions of each species.