Ecological cladistics—an investigation of numerical cladistics as a method for analysing ecological data
- 1 August 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Natural History
- Vol. 20 (4), 895-909
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938600770661
Abstract
This paper argues the case for the use of numerical cladistics in ecological analysis. A brief background to the use of techniques which group on similarity in taxonomy and ecology is given. The difference between cladistics and phenetics is explored and the implications for ecological analysis considered. The theoretical justification for the use of numerical cladistics in ecology is presented. Five marine and freshwater data sets are re-analysed using the numerical cladistic programs PHYLIP and PAUP and the results compared with standard ecological techniques. It is concluded that numerical cladistics is more effective than numerical phenetic programs such as ordination because of greater explanatory power and the incorporation of a logical criterion, parsimony, to select between competing explanations.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL WAGNER COMPUTER PROGRAMSCladistics, 1985
- Panbiogeography: A Progressive Research Program?Systematic Zoology, 1984
- A New Look at the Predictive Value of Numerical ClassificationsSystematic Zoology, 1984
- The detection of differences among assemblages of marine benthic species based on an assessment of dominance and diversityJournal of Natural History, 1983
- Simplicity and Informativeness in Systematics and PhylogenySystematic Zoology, 1982
- Classes and CladistsSystematic Zoology, 1982
- Hennig's Parasitological Method: A Proposed SolutionSystematic Zoology, 1981
- The Information Content of the Phylogenetic SystemSystematic Zoology, 1979
- Alternative Methods of Phylogenetic Inference and Their InterrelationshipSystematic Zoology, 1979
- An Estimate of Phylogenetic Relationships within the Genus Crusea (Rubiaceae) Using Character Compatibility AnalysisSystematic Botany, 1978