Development of Procedures for Direct Extraction of Cryptosporidium DNA from Water Concentrates and for Relief of PCR Inhibitors
Open Access
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Vol. 71 (3), 1135-1141
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.71.3.1135-1141.2005
Abstract
Extraction of high-quality DNA is a key step in PCR detection of Cryptosporidium and other pathogens in environmental samples. Currently, Cryptosporidium oocysts in water samples have to be purified from water concentrates before DNA is extracted. This study compared the effectiveness of six DNA extraction methods (DNA extraction with the QIAamp DNA minikit after oocyst purification with immunomagnetic separation and direct DNA extraction methods using the FastDNA SPIN kit for soil, QIAamp DNA stool minikit, UltraClean soil kit, or QIAamp DNA minikit and the traditional phenol-chloroform technique) for the detection of Cryptosporidium with oocyst-seeded samples, DNA-spiked samples, and field water samples. The study also evaluated the effects of different PCR facilitators (nonacetylated bovine serum albumin, the T4 gene 32 protein, and polyvinylpyrrolidone) and treatments (the use of GeneReleaser or ultrafiltration) for the relief from or removal of inhibitors of PCR amplification. The results of seeding and spiking studies showed that PCR inhibitors were presented in all DNA solutions extracted by the six methods. However, the effect of PCR inhibitors could be relieved significantly by the addition of 400 ng of bovine serum albumin/μl or 25 ng of T4 gene 32 protein/μl to the PCR mixture. With the inclusion of bovine serum albumin in the PCR mixture, DNA extracted with the FastDNA SPIN kit for soil without oocyst isolation resulted in PCR performance similar to that produced by the QIAamp DNA minikit after oocysts were purified by immunomagnetic separation.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of an alternative IMS dissociation procedure for use with Method 1622: detection of Cryptosporidium in waterJournal of Microbiological Methods, 2003
- Real-Time PCR for Quantification of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in Environmental Water Samples and SewageApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003
- Immunomagnetic Separation (IMS)-Fluorescent Antibody Detection and IMS-PCR Detection of Seeded Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts in Natural Waters and Their LimitationsApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2002
- Effects of pH and Magnetic Material on Immunomagnetic Separation of Cryptosporidium Oocysts from Concentrated Water SamplesApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2002
- Development of a nested-PCR assay for the detection of cryptosporidium parvum in finished waterWater Research, 2001
- Identification of 5 Types ofCryptosporidiumParasites in Children in Lima, PeruThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2001
- NewCryptosporidiumGenotypes in HIV-Infected PersonsEmerging Infectious Diseases, 1999
- Fast and reliable extraction of protozoan parasite DNA from fecal specimens2Molecular Diagnosis, 1999
- PCR detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in environmental samples--a review of published protocols and current developmentsJournal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 1998
- Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in faeces: Comparison of conventional coproscopical methods and the polymerase chain reactionVeterinary Parasitology, 1996